BTW. that's a cool costume. Most people don't realize that victor Frankenstein's monster doesn't have a name. Frankenstein is actually the guy who made him. Good book - Philliprocks 307.1 #588 10-15-12 9:26PM
I was just going to say that, lol! So many people think that the monster's name is Frankenstein. It's an excellent read! - Spoonful_O_Sugar 439.2 #288 10-15-12 9:28PM
And Frankenstein's author was actually a woman named Mary Shelly. I still love 💚Framkenweenie ! - RadiatorSprings4Ever 167.0 #2091 10-15-12 9:46PM
Well if Victor Frankenstein brought life back to the dead body of a guy that passed, then wouldnt that make him a Frankenstein by default? Being that this person was dead, he is no longer his former person, and only knows of his origins as a Frankenstien. - BambooMike 129.4 #2639 10-15-12 9:55PM
Thus making him a Frankenstein Monster... - BambooMike 129.4 #2639 10-16-12 3:16AM
You mean that the audience could call it "A Frankenstein"--named after the scientist who created it? That's true, but Frankenstein never named his monster in the narrative, so it would be something the audience just makes up. And the monster is composed of parts of dead people: it's not a single body brought back to life, so it's a composite of different identities. Interesting theory, though. - Spoonful_O_Sugar 439.2 #288 10-16-12 5:53AM
What is this book for but the reading audience? He was Still Frankenstein's creation... Wether its parts from multiple people, he is still is responsible for bringing all the pieces together and giving them life. So I say the correct term should be a "Frankenstein Monster" not necessarily an actual Frankenstein family member, but still the monster created by Victor Frankenstein. - BambooMike 129.4 #2639 10-20-12 3:58AM
